Doctor Picture

Doctor Picture
Canada's Crooked Lawyers and Crooked Judges Destroyed Dr. Kuntz Who Saved Lives & Fixed People

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

DR. Kuntz Supports Work of Canadian Legal and Judicial Blogs Exposing Court Corruption in BC

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 10:17 PM, John Kuntz <kuntz_jd@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Hello Joe Adam,
Editor, Canadian Legal and Judicial Blogs
Keep up the good work - you have an enormous task ahead of you and I would be glad to provide any assistance based my experience of three decades of involvement in the search for justice in the corrupt courts of Canada.
 
The new Justin Trudeau government just launched a new Department of Innovation to exploit Canadian inventiveness as a major part of the new government plans to expand the economy of Canada.  This plan is doomed to failure because the government has not recognized that Canada's corrupt legal system makes this country a hostile environment for innovation and an unsafe place for patent development and manufacture of new products.   
I am the seminal inventor of artificial disc replacement which was invented in British Columbia in 1979 and was filed for US patent protection in 1980 and was granted the seminal patent US4349921 on September 21,1982 for 52 claims.  This was the patent that laid down the foundations for a new global medical manufacturing industry by major companies in Europe and North America which was expected to be worth 12 Billion USD annually by 2015.  I was condemned, ridiculed, sued for $300 million, suspended, defrocked, erased from the medical registrar, banned from medical practice in Canada, and globally blacklisted from working in my profession throughout the English speaking world.  However my ideas thrived in exile even though my home was arsoned, my remaining assets seized, and my livelihood and source of income extinguished so that I could never defend my patents as they were being infringed around the globe, first in the USSR, then Germany and France, and finally in the USA.   Infringed portfolios of my patents by small companies were being purchased by major companies for an average price of $325 - 375 million USD and I was able to locate over $20 Billion paid by the majors for these infringed patent portfolios by over a hundred companies around the globe involved in the  manufacture of artificial discs for the spine using the 52 claims granted in US patent 4,349,921.
 
The above statement is easily verified at  freepatentsonline.com.   In their search engine, simply type in US4349921 and it should open my US patent granted September 21, 1982 when my address was 899 Lahakas Blvd, Kitimat, British Columbia.  The patent contains a link to "Primary CLASS:  623/17.16".   Click on that link and it lists 1389 other US patents listed chronologically that cite Kuntz patent US 4349921.   There are 28 pages of other patents listed chronologically.  If you go to the end of that list which is page 28, number 1388 is the Kuntz patent because the first seminal patents filed are at the bottom of the list (on page 28), whereas the latest patents filed in 2016 are at the top of the list (page 1).    The only other patent below the Kuntz patent (patent number 1389) is an unrelated patent made of a soft rubbery elastomer which has no relationship to the design and 52 Claims granted for the substantially rigid Kuntz patent made of metals and acrylic and high density polyethylene.  This is the seminal patent that started this new global direction in spine surgery which has since been endorsed, copied, manufactured and exported around the world to benefit every other country but Canada where it was invented.  As the inventor I am still being banished for this medical innovation in spine surgery that Canada is now importing from other countries infringing my patents while my own country is still refusing to acknowledge that it was invented in Canada.  That is why the plan for for a new Canadian Department of Innovation should be considered void ab initio until this country deals with the real problem of judicial racketeering which makes Canada a hostile environment for investment in new ideas and patent development. 

This case involves the largest theft of intellectual property that has ever occurred in Canada and it was all facilitated by crooked lawyers and judges acting in criminal contempt of Court to deny me the basic 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom S.7 Charter right to cross-examine and expose the scientific fraud of my accusers.  My invention became the subject of the largest medical malpractice lawsuit and insurance fraud ever concocted against a single doctor in North America.  I became the subject of a WCB-funded $300 million Rita Linnea Harriet Wilson Class Action alleging injury to 1900 patients (that did not exist) who were allegedly subjected to experimental surgery described as disc replacement using methyl methacrylate acrylic (which was not experimental in Canada or the rest of the world in the disc spaces of humans since 1955).  MMA had been used at the Montreal Neurological Institute for at least 20 years in the spine and was declared safe and advantageous for this same usage in Canada when I first used it a quarter of a century later on June 29, 1979 which was long after it was globally accepted as safe by informed spinal surgeons around the world and elsewhere in Canada.  

The case concocted against me was touted in the Press as the largest medical malpractice case in history and I was suspended without a hearing in 1986 and erased from the medical register in 1988 (before the 1990 Class Action trial) by the quasi-judicial licensing body, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C.  The College Council was in conflict because it was being blackmailed by another quasi-judicial body which was the Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia which was engaged in anti-competitive economic activity against myself for doing successful pro bono spine surgery for the disenfranchised and abandoned Injured Worker Napoli and was the only expert witness for Napoli in the landmark Napoli v. WCB case which the subject of the legal landmark Bouck judgment of February 9, 1981 which was appealed and upheld July 7, 1981 at the BCCA.  This was the case that opened tens of thousands of  closed WCB files to cross-examination to Injured Workers and their lawyers for the first time in history during appeals of their previously rejected WCB claims involving theft of their legitimate insured benefits while disability went untreated.  The WCB records indicate the crooked WCB consultants conspired to have me suspended which was an act of criminal obstruction of justice to defame Napoli's only expert witness at a time when I was the busiest spine surgeon in B.C. and practising where I was most needed - in Kitimat in the remote underserviced  Northwest quarter of  B.C. where I flew helicopter and delivered outreach clinics to remote parts of the province where I was the only orthopaedic or neurosurgeons for 15 years in one quarter of the province.

The WCB placed the College licensing body in conflict of interest because the WCB had secretly served the College as a covert co-defendant by filing a secret second undisclosed Writ in the same Class Action case which now added the College and Hospitals where I worked as covert co-defendants in a case that was never disclosed to myself because my lawyers retained by CMPA were the same lawyers acting unsuccessfuly for the WCB in the appeal of the Napoli v. WCB case where the outcome adverse to WCB interests and CMPA interests (CMPA insured the crooked WCB consultants) threatened to bankrupt both the WCB and the CMPA.  In short, the WCB blackmailed the College Council which failed to disclose their conflict and sat in judgment and erased their own co-defendant Kuntz to silence the witness against themselves in a case they had helped the WCB concoct against me for "experimental surgery" because they had a $300 million interest in the outcome of their own judgment. The two Class Action cases were then secretly dismissed in a closed court from which I was excluded from participation even though I was the only publicly identified defendant ever named.  The two Class Actions were was quietly dismissed in my favor but the BCSC Justice Lance Finch - who was in conflict as a former CMPA lawyer doing favors for his former benefactors - sat in economic conflict of interest.  Justice Finch was doing favors for friends and left NO WRITTEN REASONS FOR JUDGMENT when he secretly dismissed the largest medical malpractice case in history.  He was protecting the identity of the secret College and Hospitals named as co-defendants with myself in the second undisclosed Class Action.  He was also involved in judicial racketeering to assist the CMPA to sustain the false myth that they concocted implying that they faced a $300 million liability which was an insurance fraud CMPA was perpetuating on government to justify retaining taxpayer subsidies paid by government to doctors for the increase in CMPA premiums based upon the false myth that they faced a $300 million unfunded liabilty for the 1900 cases that were secretly dismissed by Justice Finch on July 16, 1990.  The judge failed to publish Written Reasons for Judgment to assist his former CMPA benefactors to retain the taxpayer subsudies taken in fraud.  Justice Finch and his cohorts then laundered the Courthouse files of all traces of the record indicating that the Class Action case against me that he had dismissed had ever even existed even though the charges defaming me had been headline news in newspapers across North America before the secret trial.  

I was denied the Charter right to attend my own trial and the case was secretly dismissed by Justice Finch leaving no paper trail so I could never be vindicated and so that the Public could never learn the identity of the secret co-defendant which was the College of Physicians and Surgeons that had concocted the case in collusion with the WCB, MSP and CMPA against me before the College Council then erased me to discredit the witness against themselves in advance of the Class Action trial.  They were all working in collusion with crooked lawyers and judges to aid and abet the theft of intellectual property by the doctors involved and the ongoing insurance fraud by the CMPA against the taxpayers of Canada which they utilized to expand the CMPA unfunded liability fund for the defense of a case which had already been secretly extinguished in the closed courtroom of the former Guild Yule CMPA lawyer Mr. Justice Lance Finch who was rewarded for his crime with a promotion as Chief Justice of B.C.. 

That is why Canada should dissolve its new Department of Innovation because Canada will remain as a hostile environment for development of new ideas until such time that it has investigated and laid charges and convicted the doctors, lawyers and judges involved in criminal obstruction of justice.  There is no room in Canada for inventors and innovators until this country purges the judiciary which is the first step in creating a new environment where it is safe to invent and innovate and expand the Canadian economy without being punished by people in authority who enjoy and abuse a presumption of regularity while quashing innovation and competition and stealing intellectual property for the personal enrichment of themselves and their friends.  

The federal government is funding the Universities but the Universities are at war with the private sector and stealing intellectual property from the private sector.  The theft of my intellectual property involved a cartel of Orthopaedic Professors from the University of Toronto and the University of British Columbia who profited economically from abuse of their University Chairs by assisting the WCB to direct anti-competitive economic activity against a member of the private sector while one of these Professors infringed my intellectual property USA patent 4349921.  

All of the lawyers and judges involved were in conflict and when exposed, refused to step down which was a violation of S.28 (1) of the federal Supreme Court Act which governs the behavior of judges.  I complained to the Canadian Judicial Council but functioned as an early warning system for aberrant judges who then stalked their critic from the bench in retaliation.  Three of the judges I sought to impeach - Justice Esson, Justice McEachern and Justice Beverley McLachlin all stalked me from the bench and refused to recuse themselves by sitting in judgment of their accuser after their own prior involvement in the lower courts in judging the same cause or matter before their appointments to the higher court.  This constituted criminal abuse of authority in violation of S.28 (1) of the federal Supreme Court Act which precluded their further involvement to cause harm to their critic for having complained about them to the Canadian Judicial Council.

I was denied Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms S.7 right to cross-examine and expose the conflicts and scientific fraud of my accusers, and denied the S.11 (d) Charter right to be considered innocent before a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal which ought to have precluded participation of the Council of the College and judges who had prior involvement, refused to recuse themselves, and sat in conflict of interest.  The judges behaved as gossip-mongers and accomplices of my accusers and abused their judgments as platforms to disseminate false, untested, derogatory, defamatory portions of a false, untested, judicially sealed College Investigation Report that was already protected and banned from circulation by a BCSC seal and distribution ban which was contested by the College and upheld by a judge of the B.C. Court of Appeal.  The law-breaking doctors, lawyers and judges all acted in Criminal contempt of Court and the judges knowingly abused their judgments to circulate pages of that sealed Report which they knew was a false untested judicially sealed document replete with compound hearsay which these tainted judges then distributed onto the shelves of every Law Library in Canada.  In short, I was being subjected to compound criminal defamation by judges that were sitting in conflict all the way up the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.  They were violating the Charter, the judicial seal and distribution ban, and were even violating S.28(1) of the Federal Supreme Court Act which ought to have prevented them from sitting in judgment in the higher court after prior involvement in judging the same cause or matter in the lower Court.

The corruption of the Canadian Courts and the enormity of this Canadian Judicial Crime against Innovation renders the new Department of Innovation void ab initio until such a time that it launches and completes an independent investigation of these judicial crimes of obstruction of justice where lawyers and judges knowingly violated the laws of Canada and the Charter by aiding and abetting theft of intellectual property while facilitating the largest medical malpractice insurance fraud in Canadian history engineered by the CMPA [Canadian Medical Protective Association] and WCB in collusion with the College and BCMA.  It involved billions of dollars taken in fraud in the form of government taxpayer subsidies to expand CMPA unfunded liability reserves for a case that was extinguished and the funds were then used to enrich lawyers blackmailing doctors and driving the exodus of surgical specialists from Canada to escape judicial blackmail which is the real cause of the long surgical waiting lists in Canada.  

Unresolved judicial racketeering precludes the development of intellectual property in Canada.  The resolution requires an international investigation using the powers of Canada and the USA under the auspices of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act described as the RICO Laws.  The reason this investigation should be international is because the U. of Toronto Professor abused my Canadian copyrighted 292 page book "The Organ of Stress"  which reported successful five year follow-ups of up to four level cervical disc replacements and abused that copyrighted work to aid and abet the anti-competitive economic activity of his Vancouver U.B.C. confreres who used my scientific work to condemn, ridicule, and remove me as the seminal Canadian inventor of disc replacement and holder of the seminal US Patent 4349921 while their Toronto affiliate incorporated Health and Research Services in Etobicoke Ontario to infringe my patents.  U. of T. Professor of Orthopaedics Dr. John Kostuik then infringed my patents and took the stolen intellectual property across the border for development at the most prestigious medical research institution in North American which was at the Johns Hopkins University in Maryland.  Dr. Kostuik exploited my Canadian innovation and invention for his own personal enrichment while hiding the source of his ideas.  Not suprisingly he became notorious himself for being the most sued doctor in Maryland.  

This was a crime against Canada because by removing myself as the inventor and  positioning himself on the world stage as an innovator of disc replacement, none of the economic benefits accrued to Canada where the disc was invented.  Not one single job was ever developed in Canada which was intended to be the headquarters for the company I incorporated in 1983 in British Columbia as Kuntz Neuropaedics Research and Development Limited.  The defamatory report used by the biased WCB-directed College Investigators to suspend me without a hearing actually ridiculed and condemned my plans to develop an industry to manufacture the disc in British Columbia.  Accordingly, Canada received no economic benefits whatsoever from Canadian Innovation which was echoed, endorsed and copied in teaching hospitals around the globe and it is a charade to present this country as a haven for innovation before the government purges the judicial system of law-breaking judges who disrespect the rule of law.

If the Canadian government still wishes to pursue this charade that innovation is the economic solution for Canada's future development, then its first priority must be an investigation of the corruption in the Canadian Justice Department that precludes Canada as a safe haven for development of new intellectual property.  This must be an international investigation involving the USA RICO LAWS because the stolen Kuntz intellectual property was taken across the border for the personal enrichment of the doctor that was involved in anti-competitive economic activity and the removal of competition from the seminal inventor in Canada. The investigation must be international in scope because it also involves the USSR, Germany and France where the Kuntz disc was also patented.  All of these  countries facilitated in the theft and infringement of Canadian intellectual property which was the consequence of judicial racketeering in Canada.  If the Canadian government is unwilling to do this and purge the justice system of all the crooked doctors, lawyers and judges involved in criminal obstruction of justice, then it would be best to dissolve the new Department of Innovation and accept Canada's future as a nation of hewers of wood and drawers of water.  

Google Scholar is an international source of global scholarly work and if one types "Kuntz" into the Google Scholar Search engine, the second name on the list is my own because  I was independently verified as the inventor of the artificial disc replacement.  What is noteworthy is that it has also been cited in 1020 other scholarly works around the globe.  Each of these references are listed and what is interesting is list of companies who have acquired the rights include many of the major medical device companies in North  America and Europe.  This should give some insight as to the importance of this Canadian innovation to the world economy and more importantly about the enormous loss of economic opportunity to Canada which allowed its unaccountable judges to abuse the courts to banish the inventor but failed to realize that there is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.

The following is a list of the global patent portfolio granted to J.D. Kuntz of Kitimat which was meant to be the intellectual property foundation for a medical device manufacturing industry providing employment and economic opportunities for Canada.  All of these goals were thwarted by crooked doctors, lawyer and judges who violated the laws of Canada and must be made accountable for their abuse of power and intellectual crimes against humanity before the new Department of Innovation can justify its own existence.  

- USA patent #4,349,921 September 21, 1982
-Canadian   #1,146,301 May 17th, 1983
-European Common #0,042,271 granted 04.09.84
 Designated contracting states listed as
 CH, DE FR GB IT LI SE
-USSR #1127522 A, 1 abrycta 1984r.
-Brazil No.PI 8103700, granted April 29, 1986
-Mexico No. 187762 1985-86
-Japanese patent application

_________________________________

The BC Government Media Attempts to Bamboozle BC Public About Court Corruption

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 6:08 AM, Joe Adam <legaljudicialblogs@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ms. Carpenter:
 
I am writing to follow up on our telephone conversation that was prompted by your press release that contained the following false and misleading statement
 
 
I am the lead Editor at Canadian Legal and Judicial Blogs which publishes stories about corruption in the Canadian courts and legal system. These stories are true and some have been published for seven, eight and nine years now receiving many thousands of visitors and remain unchallenged.
 
There is for example the disgraceful story of the destruction of Dr. John David Kuntz http://drkuntz.blogspot.com carried out by crooked lawyers and judges.
There is also the huge story of the terrorism by BC government against the English family in Tofino and the role of the legal profession and courts in that case http://cuabcimc.blogspot.ca
More recently, there is the tale of the filing of the false and misleading affidavit by Vancouver lawyer Brian Markus who was obviously trying to engineer the theft of the farm owned by Gordon and Catherine Pastula yet the Law Society refuses to investigate the criminal evidence. http://pastula.blogspot.ca  
Mr. Carten has been assisting a number of people including Robert Stark a Vancouver janitor who was cheated by crooked lawyers and judges in the BC Courts. Mr. Stark has complained to Attorney General Anton who refuses to investigate the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court as the legislation says she must.
These three stories are part of litigation involving BC lawyer John Carten whom the Law Society is persecuting because he is assisting citizens protect themselves against gangster lawyers and judges.
We have many more blogs out there all doing their job informing the public in Canada and around the world that the BC courts are crooked and that the corruption that is systemic while Attorney General Anton and Premier Clark do nothing.
Mr. Carten maintains the Water War Crimes web site www.waterwarcrimes.com al of  which is true and which has been visited by over 1 million viewers from every country on earth.
BTW, there is some interesting background information on Judge Klinger being a possible pedofile in the affidavit material filed by the Law Society against Mr. Carten that can be viewed at  www.lawsocietybc.weebly.com at .
We have not published the information about Judge ______because it is not properly documented but if true it  suggests he is an inappropriate person for the bench and he should be behind bars. Mr. Carten says he was surprised the Law Society filed it on court because it can now be commented upon openly by the media.   
As requested my telephone number is xxxxxx.     
Kindest regards,
Joe Adam
Editor,
Canadian Legal and Judicial Blogs

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Simplicity vs Complexity & More Developments In The Case of Dr. Kuntz





Dr. Kuntz
The key to understanding the absolute corruption involved in the lawyer-led conspiracy against Dr. John David Kuntz is to clearly understand that the massive class action lawsuit filed against him in the 1980's on behalf of 1,900 alleged victims of his experimental procedures and claiming over $300 million (in 1987 dollars) was quietly dismissed by consent shortly after the Government of British Columbia agreed to pay the lawyers involved a huge pile of money. One of the law firms involved in the pay off was Harper Grey Easton where Christopher Hinkson (shown below on right) was a partner.

All of the patients disappeared because they did not exist, proving once again that the bigger the lie the more people are likely to believe it.

But, injustice does not simply disappear.

Recently, the Law Society of British Columbia initiated a legal action against former British Columbia lawyer John Frederick Carten who assisted to publish this blog setting out the details of the lawyer led conspiracy against Dr. Kuntz.

Mr. Carten is a highly credible lawyer who carried on a successful law practice for many years until he too became the victim of some lying, cheating, thieving, crooked lawyers and judges in British Columbia.   

The following are links to a few of the significant cases where Mr. Carten appeared as legal counsel before the corrupt insiders at the Law Society of British Columbia, the Government of British Columbia and Government of Canada turned against him because he refused to join their crooked ways.

Schnurch v. Ploeger, 1991 CanLII 140 (BC CA)

Cooper v. Miller, 1991 CanLII 1444 (BC CA)

Gary Clarke Holdings Ltd. v. Eaglecrest Security Systems Ltd., 1992 CanLII 1650 (BC SC)

Cunningham v. Wheeler; Cooper v. Miller; Shanks v. McNee, [1994] 1 SCR 359, 1994 CanLII 120 (SCC) (Supreme Court of Canada)

John Carten Personal Law Corp. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 1997 CanLII 2008 (BC CA)

Snowcap Waters Ltd. and Sun Belt Water Inc. v. British Columbia, 1997 CanLII 810 (BC SC)

434438 B.C. Ltd. v. R.S. & D. Contracting Ltd., 1999 CanLII 5128 (BC SC)

In 1998 and 1999, Mr. Carten was attacked, put in jail in a rigged case where he was denied the right to call key witnesses and financially destroyed by a network of crooked lawyers and judges working for Government of British Columbia and Government of Canada

Mr. Carten warned that his life was in danger from the criminals who had attacked him so he went  underground and began investigating judicial and legal corruption in British
Christopher  Hinkson 
Columbia. 

The first rule of warfare is to know one's enemy.  When he studied the tactics and methods of the dirty lawyers and judges who attacked him Mr. Carten met many of other victims who had been abused in other cases, including Dr. Kuntz.

It was not a coincidence that two of the key players in the conspiracies against both Mr. Carten and Dr. Kuntz were Robert Edwards, the former Deputy Minister of the Ministry of the Attorney General for British Columbia, and Christopher Hinkson, a former law partner with Harper Grey Easton and the present Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia who, according to sources, is also a member of the criminal organization in British Columbia known as Freemasonry. 

Robert Edwards, also a Freemason, is dead and was murdered by a sudden heart attack on November 5, 2007.  Edwards was one of 12 judges involved in the judicial conspiracy against Mr. Carten that suddenly dropped dead when their corruption was exposed online.

Cick here to go to Dead Judges Don't Lie a blog identifying the crimes by the judges in question      

Recently, Dr. Kuntz has joined a several other British Columbia citizen victims of legal and judicial corruption and provided sworn affidavits to support Mr. Carten in a despicable lawsuit brought by the Law Society of British Columbia against Mr. Carten.

Click here to read the affidavits filed in support of Mr. Carten

One of the other lawyers involved in the corrupt conspiracy against Dr. John David Kuntz was  Mr. J. Christopher Grauer who, now, is also a justice on the Supreme Court of British Columbia who, now, is the presiding judge in a case that has all the appearances of a judicial / lawyer corruption case involving the law firm of Nathanson Schacter Thompson a law firm that has developed a notorious reputation for becoming involved in fee disputes with clients who clearly think the law firm was gouging them. 

As a reward for his services in destroying Dr. KuntzJ. Christopher Grauer was appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia in April 2008.

Historically Grauer was a founding partner of Dives, Grauer & Harper, a small firm that specialized in civil litigation and health law but before that Grauer was also a partner with notorious gang known as Bull, Housser & Tupperfrom 1988 to 1999, and an associate lawyer and junior partner with that firm from 1981 to 1988.  Bull Housser Tupper played a key role in the destruction of Dr. Kuntz.

Monday, September 7, 2015

Some background on the Dr. Kuntz Story and British Columbia Chief Justice Chris Hinkson

Chief Justice Hinkson 
Readers are encouraged to read the blog post made on September 10, 2010 to get the big picture of what happened in the case of Dr. Kuntz and why he was destroyed. 

What follows is a reprint of email correspondence from Dr. Kuntz to his friend "Derek" that puts the present Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia squarely in the middle of some very deep corruption in British Columbia that may explain why Chris Hinkson was appointed to his exalted position. (Photos are added)

Readers must understand that the CMPA referred to by Dr. Kuntz is formally known as the Canadian  Medical Protective Association and consists of a number of large Canadian law firms that regularly represent doctors in medical malpractice cases. In British Columbia, the key CMPA law firm is Harper Grey Easton. 

Communications by Dr. David Kuntz with Reference to:

J. Ted Hinkson and Harper Grey lawyers Harvey Grey and Chris Hinkson.

Chris Hinkson is Ted Hinkson’s Son

Ted Hinkson Graduated from Law School with Mary Southin,

And worked he as a lawyer with Guild Yule

31 Aug 2015 6.35 pm (Email)

Derek:

I am still discovering judicial fraud.  For example, a valid B.C. Court of Appeal hearing requires three Court of Appeal judges.   Harvey Grey told me not to attend my appeal of the Cohen judgment in Coughlin v. Kuntz  "just in case we lose".  I disobeyed his orders not to attend and to his dismay I appeared in Court.  I did not know Harvey Grey's partner was Chris Hinkson and I did not know that the biased judge on the bench was Justice Ted Hinkson, a former CMPA  Guild Yule lawyer whose son Chris Hinkson was also a former CMPA Guild Yule lawyer was now Harvey Grey's partner at Harper Grey Easton and Company which held the CMPA contract to defend all CMPA-insured doctors (including myself) in B.C..   Harvey Grey had earlier told me he would "vindicate" me by using the "new evidence"  of prior usage of methyl methacrylate and he had lied to me - he did not enter a single published paper nor did he argue the evidence that would vindicate me.  Justice Ted Hinkson and the CMPA and Harvey Grey had a vested economic interest in upholding the Cohen judgment against me because it would ensure more litigation would continue based of the experimental surgery scientific fraud of the Cohen judgment which Harvey Grey was supposed to correct.  In retrospect Ted Hinkson was enriching his son Chris Hinkson who was already a financial partner with Harvey Grey.  Ted Hinkson yelled out from the bench at Harvey Grey who hung his head in mock shame  as Hinkson defamed me by yelling " Your client is knife happy!".    Over a quarter of a century later I now realize that this was a one judge Kangaroo Court - a B.C. Court of Appeal required three judges and there was only one judge present and his son was Harvey Grey's partner.  Justice Ted Hinkson sat on the bench alone to enrich the Hinkson family  and he was working in collusion with Harvey Grey in the absence of the two other required Court of Appeal judges to uphold the Cohen judgment that would enrich both Harvey Grey and his partner Chris Hinkson and their mutual CMPA benefactors by perpetuating the scientific fraud the Methyl Methacrylate usage for disc replacement was "experimental surgery".   

The Hinkson BCCA Court of Appeal judgment was "void ab initio", firstly because Justice Ted Hinkson was in conflict judging a case which would enrich Harvey Grey and Ted Hinkson's son Chris Hinkson, and secondly because the Court did not have a quorum which required a three judge bench. That means the BCCA judgment was invalid and it requires a new trial and that Justice Ted Hinkson and Harvey Grey should both face criminal charges for fixing cases. Harvey Grey was a bencher of the Law Society and knew that I was entitled to a three judge bench and that I did not receive a fair hearing under S.11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

Similarly, the Southin judgment in De Sousa v. Kuntz and Kitimat General Hospital was "void ab initio" because the Kitimat General Hospital was filed and defended by lawyers at Bull Housser Tupper who were Mary Southin's partners at BHT and she was still a lawyer at BHT when the Hospital was being defended by her partner Chris Grauer at BHT.  Southin and Grauer were acting in collusion and she sat in conflict to enrich her BHT partners and she had a duty to recuse herself when she stalked me from the bench.  That means the Southin judgment was void ab initio. 

Robert Bauman
[Editors Note: The present Chief Justice of British Columbia is Robert Bauman (swhown in photo on left) who was, at one time, a senior partner at Bull Housser Tupper along with Canada's Chief Justice Beverely McLachlin.]    

That means that both the De Sousa case must be overturned by the Parliament and the Coughlin case must be overturned by the Parliament.

The College erasure must also be overturned by the Parliament because the College Council sat in conflict in judgment of their co-defendent Kuntz and adverse in economic interest in a case valued at $300 million because the College was a covert defendant with myself in the secret undisclosed second Writ filed as the  Rita Linnea Harriet Wilson et al Class Action v. Dr. Kuntz, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Kitimat General Hospital and Wrinch Memorial Hospital .  This was a violation of S.11(d) of the Charter which does not allow one defendant to sit in judgment of another defendant because the Charter requires a fair hearing and the College had a vested interest in defaming and discrediting the witness against themselves in 1988 in advance of the Class Action which was still outstanding.  

JDK

1st Sept 2015 12.05 AM (Email)

Derek:

I think we should send John Carten a copy of this recent material on the judicial scam of Ted Hinkson who was working with Harvey Grey to enrich his son Chris Hinkson who was Harvey Grey's partner by denying me a fair B.C. Court of Appeal hearing when I appealed the Cohen judgment in Coughlin v. Kuntz.  The BCCA hearing was bogus because it was supposed to be a Court of Appeal hearing and there was only one biased judge present - Ted Hinkson - and a B.C. Court of Appeal is supposed to sit three BCCA judges on the bench.   That shows that Justice Ted Hinkson and Harvey Grey were in cahoots to obstruct justice and deny me my S.11(d) Charter right to a fair hearing at the B.C. Court of Appeal.   I was entitltled to a fair Appeal hearing before three judges.  Where were they?   Ted Hinkson was the father of Chris Hinkson who was the covert partner of Harvey Grey since 1978 and both Harvey Grey and his partner Chris Hinkson stood to profit if Ted Hinkson obstructed justice by proceeding without a quorum of three BCCA judges when he upheld the Cohen judgment to ensure that the precedent would stand and thereby invite a large number of cases against me based on the Cohen judgment, all of which would enrich Harvey Grey and the judge's son Ted Hinkson who were jointly partnered to profit from the theft of CMPA funds so long as more cases for experimental surgery continued to be filed against me which required Ted Hinkson to uphold the precedent Cohen judgment.  That was why I was denied a three judge B.C. Court of Appeal hearing.    The federal parliament has a duty to exercise the Charter S.33 power to overrule the judge Ted Hinkson on grounds that he knowingly held a bogus BCCA hearing without a quorum so as to uphold the Cohen judgment and deny me a fair hearing before a three man BCCA bench and thereby enrich his son Chris Hinkson who was Harvey Grey's covert partner at Harper Grey Easton and Company which held the CMPA contract to defend doctors in B.C. 

JDK

1st Sept 2015 12.35 PM (Email)

Derek:

Justice Ted Hinkson – changed the names of BCCA judges who heard the Napoli and Coughlin Appeals.

The information below cannot be correct because Dr. J.D. Kuntz was in the Courtroom at the Appeal of the Cohen judgment in Coughlin v. Kuntz  and there was only one judge present for the entire appeal and it was BCCA Justice Ted Hinkson.   There was no other judge present in the courtroom other than the biased Justice Ted Hinkson.  There was absolutely no presence of Justice Taggart and Gibb in the appeal of the Cohen judgment in Coughlin v. Kuntz!

If the information recorded below by JDK was taken off the published BCCA documents of the appeal, than those false records of the  Kuntz Appeal of the Cohen judgment in the Coughlin v. Kuntz  Appeal  were clearly altered by the tainted Justice Ted Hinkson who was the only judge present at the Appeal and the only one capable of tampering with the published court documents containing that fraudulent information that stated  Taggart and Gibb were present when they were never there.  That means that Justice Hinkson was conducting a fraudulent court of appeal session as the sole judge on a three man bench which did not exist and that makes his deceitful publication of the outcome of a phony BCCA hearing nothing less that void ab ignitio because it occurred in the absence of a quorum of three judges. 

The following three  paragraphs were most likely copied by Kuntz from the published BCCA  records that named the judges who were were supposed to have judged the Coughlin Appeal and the De Sousa Appeal.   Since Dr. Kuntz disobeyed Harvey Grey’s instructions not to attend and because he did attend the entire appeal,  Dr. Kuntz knew that Ted Hinkson was the only judge on the BCCA bench hearing his Appeal.   That means Ted Hinkson altered the records.

It should also be noted that this was the second time that Ted Hinkson altered published records of BCCA trials in which he was involved.   Ted Hinkson also altered the records of the Napoli V. WCB Appeal where the court records show his involvement as a judge at the trial whereas the published record shows that Hinkson’s name was replaced by MacDonald so as to hide Ted Hinkson’s involvement.

The following three paragraphs were taken from the document #10 Ted Hinkson authored by Dr. Kuntz:

On December 19, 1989, Justices Hinkson, Taggart and Gibbs in the

B.C. Court of Appeal dismissed Dr. Kuntz’s appeal of the Cohen

judgment in WCB-funded Coughlin v. Kuntz case [CA008375].

Dec. 19, 1989 B.C. Court of Appeal

judgment of Justices Hinkson, Taggart and Gibb who dismissed Dr.

Kuntz’s appeal of the Cohen judgment in the WCB-funded Coughlin

v. Kuntz case [CA008375]].

On March 9, 1988, Justices Hinkson, Craig, Wallace of the B.C. Supreme Court

upheld the De Sousa v. Kuntz judgment of Justice Southin [CA009275].

JDK

Sept. 2nd 2015 8.59 AM (Email)

Derek:

The modus operandi of Harper Grey Easton and Company was to withhold evidence that would undermine the defense of their clients to instigate more litigation which would be directed to their law firm by CMPA by right of their monopoly on the defense of medical malpractice litigation of doctors insured by CMPA in British Columbia.  HGE and company was in the business of expanding litigation against doctors that they would get to enrich themselves from defending while dipping into the CMPA coffers. 

JDK

[Editors Note: When  John Carten and Derek met with a CBC reporter about this story and showed the CBC reporter the documents that proved the whole class action case against Dr. Kuntz was a massive fraud because the case was dismissed without ever dealing with the claims of 1400 patients that Dr. Kuntz was alleged to have harmed with experimental surgery the CBC reporter got scared and said the case was too big for her to report.]
[Editors Note: If the patients were really hurt by the surgery done by Dr. Kuntz they would not have dropped their lawsuit and the case would have proceeded to court and there would have been a huge award in damages. One of the frailties of human beings that scammers, deceivers, liars and dirty lawyers take advantage of is that the bigger the lie, the more readily people will believe it.]
 

Friday, September 10, 2010

How Canada's Top Law Firms Used A Fraudulent Lawsuit To Destroy A Great Doctor and Line Their Pockets

In the history of mankind, great men, men of genius, men of great intelligence, men of great ability and great talent have often been attacked by lesser souls, by the incompetent, by the jealous, by the stupid, by the craven and the greedy  who take more satisfaction in the destruction of their superiors than in their own success.

Dr. John David Kuntz
When Dr. John David Kuntz (shown in photo on left) moved to British Columbia to take up the practice of medicine, after University of Toronto, the local College of Physicians and Surgeons recommended that he set up shop in his speciality, orthopaedic surgery, in Kitimat, a remote small community, population 8,000, in north western British Columbia.

The Vancouver market was already crowded with specialists who did not want more competition and, for Dr.Kuntz, who grew up in the remote northwestern Ontario community of Red Lake, the prospect of spending his working life, near or in "the bush", as Canadians call their wilderness, was not at all unattractive.
graduation from the

Soon after he arrived in Kitimat, Dr. Kuntz came face to face with the grim reality of the industrial resource extraction economy of rural British Columbia in the form of crippled and injured young and middle aged men who had suffered spinal injuries while working. 

Being a man of genius and talent, Dr. Kuntz quickly realized that what was keeping these otherwise healthy men from returning to an active life was the fact that the disks between the vertebrae in their backs had ruptured or collapsed and, at the time, there was nothing that surgery could do for them except a spinal fusion that left them relatively crippled.  Dr. Kuntz put his mind to the problem and, using his native genius and god-given talents invented "spinal disk replacement surgery" at his clinic in Kitimat.

Soon afterwards, Dr. Kuntz was the leading orthopaedic surgeon in British Columbia, doing approximately 50 % of all of the spinal surgery in British Columbia from his medical practice in Kitimat.   

The success of Dr. Kuntz caused problems for two entrenched groups.

1.  The other orthopaedic surgeons in British Columbia, especially in Vancouver, who saw their income levels dropping and patient base dwindling because of the genius in Kitimat.

2.  The Workers Compensation system in British Columbia that was facing angry demands for a return of assessments from industrial employers whose workers had returned to work.  The Workers Compensation system  in British Columbia had become an insurance racket where employers of injured workers were fined with heavy up front assessments that were parsimoniously paid to injured workers as paltry monthly benefits.  The incoming lump funds generated a huge cash reserve that supported a well paid, nepotistic, bureaucracy while injured workers and their families struggled to survive on minimum monthly support cheques.

Literally, Dr. Kuntz made the lame walk.  He was a modern miracle worker, like Jesus, and, like Jesus, Dr. Kuntz was crucified by the lawyers and the judges - the Sanhedrin - not because he healed on the Sabbath but because he healed where others could not.

The adversaries of Dr. Kuntz consulted their lawyers, in Vancouver, and hatched a devious and diabolical plan to destroy Dr. Kuntz by using the College of Physicians and Surgeons to stop his work on the grounds it was "experimental medicine" and by launching a "fraudulent" class action lawsuit against him on behalf of 1,900 patients he had allegedly injured by his experimental surgery.

The same group of lawyers also launched a similar fraudulent class action lawsuit against the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, the professional organization that governs the practice of medicine in British Columba.  This was a terrorist tactic intended to frighten the College into complete submission.  

The plan worked. 

The medical profession, frightened by the prospect of insurance claims in the hundreds of millions of dollars, payable to some fictictious 1,900 patients, moved quickly to strip Dr. Kuntz of his licence to practice medicine notwithstanding the fact that Dr. Kuntz never treated 1,900 patients and that all, excepting a very few, patients, were living, very contentedly, with the surgery he had performed and many of his former patients signed a petition in support of Dr. Kuntz to help him keep his licence.  There were two such petitions one with 5,000 signatures and another with 8,000 signatures.

When the insiders with the Vancouver legal establishment realized the success of their bold and diabolical plan against Dr. Kuntz they then turned their sights on an ever greater fraud against the public treasury by persuading a local politicial party, to promise, as part of their electoral platform, that their government would pay the medical insurance fees of the doctors and, with this bold statement, the party won the support of the medical profession in British Columbia that was now saved from the prospect of huge medical insurance fees to cover the fraudulent claims against Dr. Kuntz and the support of a number of Canada's leading law firms that made up the Canadian Medical Protective Association, CMPA, and who were set to benefit from the fraud based premiums to by collected from the unsuspecting taxpayers.

At this point, we have to explain to the reader that, in Canada, medical doctors do not pay insurance premiums for malpractice to a properly organized insurance company.  Instead, they make regular  payments to the CMPA, that describes itself as a "not-for-profit, mutual defence organization for physicians, by physicians" and is, essentially, an association made up of several large Canadian law firms that decide which claims to pay and which ones to resist.   

The lawyers went laughing all the way to the bank, Dr. Kuntz was destroyed and reduced to poverty.

Every lawyer Dr. Kuntz hired to resist the fraud against him was disbarred, a series of crooked judges were inserted into every application he made to court to try to get a fair hearing.  Because he was a member of the College, Dr. Kuntz was not permitted to defend the class action lawsuit which was handled on his behalf by the lawyers who were part of the conspiracy.

Eventually, the fraudulent class action lawsuit against Dr. Kuntz and the College were quietly dropped because there never were 1,900 injured patients and because the lawsuits very massive frauds intended to enrich a few greedy lawyers in a couple of prominent law firms in Vancouver.

How could this happen, you ask, in a democracy, like Canada, that boasts a competent, honest, justice system? 

Simple, the judges and lawyers in Canada are appointed by politicians and knowing that there is no independent process to investigate and discipline judicial corruption the lawyers correctly reckoned they could get away with their dirty conspiracy to deny Dr. Kuntz the basic right to cross examine and challenge his accusers and thereby loot many millions of dollars from the public. 

And, why did they do this, you ask? 

Simple, because the lawyers and judges were all connected, in a multitude of ways, to the big law firms that benefited from the huge revenues that were now pouring into the CMPA as a result of the fraudulent lawsuits they initiated.

And, how do we know the lawsuits were fraudulent?

Simple, because both lawsuits were dismissed by a Consent Order agreed to by the lawyers and the 1900 so-called victims of experimental surgery disappeared and never complained again.

Do you get it?  There never were 1900 injured patients. The claim was a fraud.  Sure, maybe one or two patients had complications form surgery.  That is to be expected. But, the 1900 figure was a lie.
It was a great lie, deliberately inflated, massively inflated, to justify a greater robbery and bamboozle the public ands it worked. When the money was paid out, the patients disappeared. They went away. They never squawked, they never complained, they never made a peep because THEY DID NOT EXIST.